Skip to content
← Back to All Bills

HB1066 Relative to warrant articles authorizing lease agreements.

Other Dead Auto-scored

Relative to warrant articles authorizing lease agreements.

Impact Score — How Does This Bill Affect You?

6

Overall Impact Score

Mixed

Scale: 1 (harmful) to 10 (beneficial)

6
💰

Your Wallet

Residents may see modest financial benefit through increased transparency and stricter repayment rules for large leases, though the bill's primary effect is procedural rather than directly lowering or raising costs.

7
🏘️

Your Community

Local communities gain meaningful democratic input through required public hearings and supermajority votes on major lease agreements over $500,000, reducing risk of large financial commitments made without broad public consent.

6
⚖️

Your Freedom

The bill enhances local control by requiring more rigorous approval processes for major leases and clarifying municipal authority, though it does not expand individual rights.

Status

Refer to Interim Study, Motion Adopted, Voice Vote; 04/16/2026; Senate Journal 9

Voted Yes

16 R + 151 D

Voted No

175 R

R Yes D Yes R No D No

Sponsor

Diane Pauer (R)

The Short Version

This bill establishes new procedures and thresholds for how New Hampshire municipalities can enter into lease agreements for property, equipment, and facilities. Leases over $500,000 now require public hearings and a 3/5 majority vote, while smaller leases can be approved by simple majority; lease agreements are now formally defined and treated as municipal debt with specific repayment rules.

Who's Behind This Bill?

Who Benefits

  • ▲ Residents and taxpayers in municipalities, who gain transparency and voting rights on major lease commitments over $500,000
  • ▲ Local selectboards and governing bodies, who receive clearer statutory authority and procedures for lease agreements
  • ▲ Communities undertaking long-term capital projects, which now have defined debt-like treatment and consistent repayment schedules

Who Pays the Price

  • ▼ Municipal officials and staff, who must comply with additional procedural requirements and public hearing timelines for leases exceeding $500,000
  • ▼ Municipalities seeking rapid approval of lease agreements, which now face 15-60 day delays for hearings and supermajority vote requirements for larger deals

Roll Call Detail (1 vote)

Every recorded floor vote on this bill, with each legislator's individual vote. Click a name to see that rep's full record.

Who actually supports this bill?

Across the 1 recorded vote on this bill — counting each legislator's net direction and treating kill motions as opposing the bill — Republicans supported it ( 175 for , 16 against ) , and Democrats opposed it ( 151 against ) .

"Supporting" means voting for passage OR voting against a kill motion. "Opposing" is the inverse. Concurs and amendment-only votes don't count.

Table 2026-03-12
Failed

YES = Kill the bill. NO = Keep the bill alive.

16R + 151D
Voted to Kill the Bill (167)
175R
Voted to Keep It Alive (175)
21
Absent
29
Not voting
Show all 392 individual votes

Voted Yea (167)

Republicans (16)
Democrats (151)

Voted Nay (175)

Republicans (175)
Absent (21)

Dale Swanson (D) , Gaby Grossman (D) , Geoff Smith (D) , Jaci Grote (D) , James Spillane (R) , Jay Markell (R) , Jeanine Notter (R) , Jennifer Rhodes (R) , John Janigian (R) , Jonathan Smith (R) , Joseph Hamblen (R) , Kevin Verville (R) , Linda Haskins (D) , Mark Warden (R) , Mary Ford (R) , Matthew Hicks (D) , Peter Lovett (D) , Peter Varney (R) , Robert Harb (R) , Stephen Pearson (R) , Thomas Buco (D)

Read the Actual Bill → See All Bills

Bill statuses as of October 7, 2026. Check LegiScan or NH General Court for the latest.

This bill was auto-scored using AI analysis of the bill text and legislative data. Scores may be refined as we review more bills.