Skip to content
← Back to All Bills

HB1184 Relative to the issuance of no trespass orders on municipal or school district property.

Education Now Law Auto-scored

Relative to the issuance of no trespass orders on municipal or school district property.

Impact Score — How Does This Bill Affect You?

6

Overall Impact Score

Mixed

Scale: 1 (harmful) to 10 (beneficial)

5
💰

Your Wallet

Estimated fiscal impact is less than $10,000 annually through 2029, with minimal direct financial effect on taxpayers or families.

7
🏘️

Your Community

Establishes clear legal authority and procedures for schools and municipalities to address safety disruptions and property damage, providing operational protection while requiring public approval for extended orders.

6
⚖️

Your Freedom

Creates procedural protections for individuals (hearings, appeals, written reasons, automatic expiration) that constrain arbitrary use of trespass orders, though allows rapid emergency exclusion from public spaces with later review.

Status

Enacted in accordance with Article 44 PartII of the N.H. Constitution without the signature of the governor. Chapter 339;eff.I. Sec 2 eff 1/1/27 II. Sec 3 eff 1/1/27 III. Rem eff 1/1/28

Voted Yes

16 R + 8 D

Voted No

0 R

R Yes D Yes R No D No

Sponsor

Juliet Harvey-Bolia (R)

The Short Version

This bill creates a formal process for municipal and school authorities to issue no trespass orders on public property, with procedural protections including written notice, a right to a hearing within 10 days, and appeal to superior court. It balances rapid response to safety threats (emergency orders up to 45 days) against due process safeguards and transparency requirements.

Who's Behind This Bill?

Who Benefits

  • ▲ School administrators and municipal officials facing disruptive or dangerous individuals on public property
  • ▲ Students and staff in schools seeking protection from threats without prolonged legal proceedings
  • ▲ Individuals subject to trespass orders who gain formal hearing and appeal rights
  • ▲ Public safety by enabling rapid response to imminent threats while requiring documented justification

Who Pays the Price

  • ▼ Individuals who may be excluded from public property based on emergency orders (though with subsequent hearing opportunity)
  • ▼ Municipalities and school districts that must conduct hearings and maintain compliance procedures

Roll Call Detail (2 votes)

Every recorded floor vote on this bill, with each legislator's individual vote. Click a name to see that rep's full record.

Who actually supports this bill?

Across the 2 recorded votes on this bill — counting each legislator's net direction and treating kill motions as opposing the bill — Republicans supported it ( 173 for , 2 against ) , and Democrats supported it ( 117 for , 27 against ) .

"Supporting" means voting for passage OR voting against a kill motion. "Opposing" is the inverse. Concurs and amendment-only votes don't count.

Veto Override 2026-08-19
Passed

YES = Override the veto (keep the bill alive). NO = Let the veto stand (kill the bill).

173R + 117D
Voted to Override (290)
2R + 27D
Voted to Sustain Veto (29)
26
Absent
39
Not voting
Show all 384 individual votes

Voted Yea (290)

Republicans (173)
Democrats (117)

Bill statuses as of October 7, 2026. Check LegiScan or NH General Court for the latest.

This bill was auto-scored using AI analysis of the bill text and legislative data. Scores may be refined as we review more bills.