← Back to All Bills

HB 1792 Bans teaching of CRT, LGBTQ+ topics, "Marxist analyses" — with $10K lawsuits and loss of teaching licenses.

"The CHARLIE Act"

Education In Senate

Bans teaching of CRT, LGBTQ+ topics, "Marxist analyses" — with $10K lawsuits and loss of teaching licenses.

Impact Score — How Does This Bill Affect You?

2

Overall Impact Score

Harmful

Scale: 1 (harmful) to 10 (beneficial)

3
💰

Your Wallet

Legal costs from $10K lawsuits fall on school districts, funded by local property taxes

2
🏘️

Your Community

Self-censorship among teachers degrades education quality and worsens teacher shortage

2
⚖️

Your Freedom

Vague restrictions on curriculum topics create uncertainty about what can be taught

Status

Passed House 184–164. Engrossed. In Senate Education Committee.

Voted Yes

180 R

Voted No

4 R + 160 D

R Yes D Yes R No D No

Sponsor

Rep. Mike Belcher (R-Wakefield)

The Short Version

Named after Charlie Kirk. Lets any parent sue a school for up to $10,000 and get a teacher's license revoked for teaching about systemic racism, LGBTQ+ identities, or anything deemed "identity-based ideology." Critics including the NH Attorney General's office argue the vague terms invite abuse and are unconstitutionally broad. Passed the House 184–164 and is now in the Senate.

Who's Behind This Bill?

Who Benefits

  • National curriculum-restriction organizations
  • Politicians building culture-war credentials

Who Pays the Price

  • NH teachers (lawsuit risk, license threats)
  • School districts (legal defense costs from property taxes)
  • Students (restricted curriculum)

Connected Organizations

Turning Point USA Heritage Foundation Moms for Liberty

Roll Call Detail (3 votes)

Every recorded floor vote on this bill, with each legislator's individual vote. Click a name to see that rep's full record.

Who actually supports this bill?

Across the 3 recorded votes on this bill — counting each legislator's net direction and treating kill motions as opposing the bill — Republicans supported it ( 184 for , 5 against ) , and Democrats opposed it ( 159 against ) .

"Supporting" means voting for passage OR voting against a kill motion. "Opposing" is the inverse. Concurs and amendment-only votes don't count.

Concur with other chamber's amendments 2026-05-21
Failed

YES = Accept the other chamber's amendments. NO = Reject the other chamber's amendments.

126R + 1D
Voted to Concur (127)
61R + 160D + 1I
Voted to Not Concur (222)
26
Absent
18
Not voting
Show all 393 individual votes

Voted Yea (127)

Republicans (126)
Democrats (1)

Voted Nay (222)

Democrats (160)
Independents (1)
Floor Amendment 2026-05-14
Passed

YES = Adopt this amendment. NO = Reject this amendment.

15R
Voted to Adopt Amendment (15)
0R + 8D
Voted Against Amendment (8)
1
Absent
0
Not voting
Show all 24 individual votes
Ought to Pass (passage vote) 2026-02-19
Passed

YES = Pass the bill. NO = Reject the bill.

184R
Voted to Pass (184)
5R + 159D
Voted Against (164)
32
Absent
13
Not voting
Show all 393 individual votes

Voted Yea (184)

Republicans (184)

Voted Nay (164)

Democrats (159)

Full Analysis

The CHARLIE Act — "Countering Hate And Revolutionary Leftist Indoctrination in Education" — is named after Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk and is the most dangerous education bill in the 2026 session. It bans any teaching deemed to promote critical race theory, LGBTQ+ identities, gender fluidity, or "Marxist analyses" in K-12 public schools.

What makes this bill uniquely destructive is its enforcement mechanism. Any parent can sue a school district for up to $10,000 if they believe a teacher has violated the law. Teachers can also lose their licenses. The terms are left deliberately vague — what counts as "identity-based ideology"? No one knows, and that's the point. The chilling effect is the goal: teachers will self-censor rather than risk their careers and their families' financial security.

The NH Attorney General's office submitted testimony opposing the bill, calling it unconstitutionally vague and likely to face immediate legal challenge. That didn't stop the House from passing it 184-164. Only 4 Republicans broke ranks to vote against it; every Democrat opposed it.

This bill is modeled on legislation pushed nationally by groups like Moms for Liberty, the Heritage Foundation, and Turning Point USA. It's part of a coordinated national strategy to control what students can learn about American history, systemic inequality, and the existence of LGBTQ+ people. If it becomes law, NH would have one of the most restrictive curriculum censorship regimes in the country.

Bill statuses as of May 2026. Check LegiScan or NH General Court for the latest.