← Back to All Bills

HB 1817 Lets EFA (voucher) students attend their public school district — but the district gets NO reimbursement.

Education Active

Lets EFA (voucher) students attend their public school district — but the district gets NO reimbursement.

Impact Score — How Does This Bill Affect You?

3

Overall Impact Score

Harmful

Scale: 1 (harmful) to 10 (beneficial)

2
💰

Your Wallet

Districts must educate returning voucher students with zero state funding reimbursement

2
🏘️

Your Community

Unfunded mandate strains local school budgets, especially in smaller districts

4
⚖️

Your Freedom

Families gain flexibility but districts lose resources to serve all students

Status

OTP-A from House Education Committee March 2. Scheduled for House vote.

Sponsor

Rep. Bill Ohm (R-Nashua)

The Short Version

Education Freedom Accounts already divert public money to private schools. This bill would let those same students come back and use public school resources without the district receiving any state funding for them. Schools would bear the cost of educating these students out of local property taxes alone. It's a one-two punch: take the state money away, then send the kid back and make the town pay anyway. The committee recommended it pass with an amendment — this one is moving.

Who's Behind This Bill?

Who Benefits

  • Voucher families who get to use both private and public systems
  • Private schools that keep the voucher money

Who Pays the Price

  • Local school districts (unfunded mandate)
  • Property taxpayers (cover costs the state won't)
  • Remaining public school students (fewer resources)

Roll Call Detail (2 votes)

Every recorded floor vote on this bill, with each legislator's individual vote. Click a name to see that rep's full record.

Who actually supports this bill?

Across the 2 recorded votes on this bill — counting each legislator's net direction and treating kill motions as opposing the bill — Republicans supported it ( 194 for , 7 against ) , and Democrats opposed it ( 157 against ) .

"Supporting" means voting for passage OR voting against a kill motion. "Opposing" is the inverse. Concurs and amendment-only votes don't count.

Ought to Pass 2026-05-14
Passed

YES = Pass the bill. NO = Reject the bill.

15R
Voted to Pass (15)
0R + 8D
Voted Against (8)
1
Absent
0
Not voting
Show all 24 individual votes
Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-03-11
Passed

YES = Pass the bill with the attached amendment. NO = Reject the bill (as amended).

179R
Voted to Pass (179)
7R + 149D
Voted Against (156)
32
Absent
25
Not voting
Show all 392 individual votes

Voted Yea (179)

Republicans (179)

Voted Nay (156)

Democrats (149)

Full Analysis

This bill is the most brazen grift in the voucher playbook. Here's how it works: a family signs up for an Education Freedom Account, and the state funding that would have gone to their public school district goes into their EFA instead — to spend on private school tuition, homeschool supplies, or other approved expenses. That money is gone from the public school's budget.

Now, HB 1817 says those same EFA families can send their kids back to the public school whenever they want — for a class, a sport, a service, whatever — and the district gets zero state funding for educating that student. The full cost of serving that student comes out of local property taxes.

Think about what this means in practice. A family takes $5,000+ in state education funding via an EFA, spends it on private school, then sends their kid to public school for special education services (which are expensive and federally required). The district must provide those services with no state support. It's privatizing the profits and socializing the costs.

The House Education Committee recommended this bill pass with an amendment, which means it has support and is moving. This is one of the bills that could do serious financial damage to school districts, especially smaller ones with tight budgets.

Bill statuses as of May 2026. Check LegiScan or NH General Court for the latest.