← Back to All Bills

SB467 Relative to the penalty for certain fentanyl-related offenses and establishing a mandatory minimum sentence for the crime of distribution of a controlled drug with death resulting.

Healthcare Dead Auto-scored

Relative to the penalty for certain fentanyl-related offenses and establishing a mandatory minimum sentence for the crime of distribution of a controlled drug with death resulting.

Impact Score — How Does This Bill Affect You?

4

Overall Impact Score

Concerning

Scale: 1 (harmful) to 10 (beneficial)

4
💰

Your Wallet

Mandatory minimums increase incarceration costs. Imprisoning more people for longer is expensive for taxpayers.

5
🏘️

Your Community

May deter some dealers but evidence shows mandatory minimums are ineffective at reducing drug distribution and can worsen the crisis.

3
⚖️

Your Freedom

Mandatory minimum sentences remove judicial discretion and can lead to unjust outcomes, particularly for low-level offenders.

Status

Refer for Interim Study: Motion Adopted Voice Vote 04/23/2026 House Journal 11

Voted Yes

0 R

Voted No

0 R

R Yes D Yes R No D No

Sponsor

William Gannon (R)

The Short Version

Would increase penalties for fentanyl offenses and create mandatory minimum sentences for drug distribution resulting in death. Targets dealers but mandatory minimums have been widely criticized for failing to deter drug crime and disproportionately impacting communities of color.

Who's Behind This Bill?

Who Benefits

  • Prosecutors seeking tougher tools against fentanyl dealers
  • Families who have lost loved ones to fentanyl overdoses

Who Pays the Price

  • Taxpayers bearing higher incarceration costs
  • Low-level offenders caught in mandatory minimum schemes
  • People struggling with addiction who share drugs

Roll Call Detail (1 vote)

Every recorded floor vote on this bill, with each legislator's individual vote. Click a name to see that rep's full record.

Who actually supports this bill?

Across the 1 recorded vote on this bill — counting each legislator's net direction and treating kill motions as opposing the bill — Republicans supported it ( 16 for ) , and Democrats opposed it ( 8 against ) .

"Supporting" means voting for passage OR voting against a kill motion. "Opposing" is the inverse. Concurs and amendment-only votes don't count.

Ought to Pass 2026-02-19
Passed

YES = Pass the bill. NO = Reject the bill.

16R
Voted to Pass (16)
0R + 8D
Voted Against (8)
0
Absent
0
Not voting
Show all 24 individual votes

Bill statuses as of May 2026. Check LegiScan or NH General Court for the latest.

This bill was auto-scored using AI analysis of the bill text and legislative data. Scores may be refined as we review more bills.